11Tiger editorial terms of use

The desk publishes editorial material only. Articles, guides, references and verification checks. The desk does not publish financial advice. The desk does not publish legal advice. The desk does not publish a partner brand’s product offering. Where the desk links to a partner brand’s published terms, the partner brand’s terms govern; the desk’s editorial notes do not override them.

State rules vary. Some states allow paid fantasy-cricket contests, some allow only free contests, some prohibit contests outright. The desk publishes a state-by-state read on the legal page; the reader is responsible for matching the published read against their own jurisdiction before placing a paid entry.

Fantasy cricket outcomes depend on player form, pitch behaviour and contest size. The desk does not promise winnings. The desk does not publish return forecasts. The desk publishes methodology, evidence, and verification checks.

The desk’s own miss record is published on the points reference and is retained alongside the desk’s hits. The miss record is the instrument that holds the methodology accountable; removing it on a hit week would be a standards fail.

The desk is not liable for losses arising from a reader’s contest decisions. The desk publishes methodology, evidence, and verification checks; the contest decision belongs to the reader. Where the desk’s own review finds an error, the desk corrects the page publicly on the corrections cadence; the desk does not refund losses attributable to a published error.

The desk’s contact channel is the route for any correction request. Where the correction is logged, the desk publishes the updated material and notes the change on the news desk.

A working checklist for the reader who lands on this page before the first paid entry. The terms page is the editorial-side terms, not the partner brand’s product-side terms; the checklist is a quick way to confirm which document governs the contest decision.

Three questions to ask before paying in. Does the desk’s editorial coverage describe the product the partner brand actually offers? Is the partner brand’s own published terms page linked from this desk or from the submissions portal? Is the state-by-state read on the legal page aligned with the reader’s jurisdiction?

What the desk does well. The terms describe the editorial material only and link to the partner’s own terms for the product-side questions. The liability statement is published in plain language and the change-log cadence is a stated value.

What the desk is still working on. A state-by-state diff view on the legal page. A standing invitation for reader-submitted evidence on the partner brand’s own terms.

A reading cadence the desk recommends. Read the terms once before the first paid entry. Re-read the terms on every material update the desk announces on the news desk.

The desk publishes editorial material. Articles, guides, references and verification checks. The desk does not publish financial advice, does not publish legal advice and does not publish a partner brand’s product offering. The line is a discipline the deck enforces on itself rather than a marketing claim.

A reader who lands on this page to read the editorial terms has, almost always, just read a page on the desk’s site that says the desk’s coverage is “editorial only”. The terms page is the place the line is published. The deck’s editorial material does not assert that any product on a partner brand’s site is suitable for any particular reader; the partner brand’s own terms govern the product offering.

The desk’s jurisdiction scope is the second most common reader question. The desk publishes editorial material on a jurisdiction-aware basis but is not licensed in any specific jurisdiction. The reader’s own jurisdiction applies; the desk’s state-by-state read on the legal page is the most current published statement.

Where the deck’s terms and a partner brand’s terms diverge, the desk’s terms govern the desk’s editorial material; the partner brand’s terms govern the partner’s product offering. Where the two documents speak to the same decision — the reader’s contest decision — the partner brand’s terms prevail because they govern the product the reader is actually entering.

The desk’s editorial material is grounded in publicly verifiable sources. The desk does not publish insider information. The desk does not publish undisclosed partner-brand-controlled data. The desk does not publish single-source claims under a “verified” label.

The desk’s editorial material is jurisdiction-aware but jurisdiction-agnostic. A reader who lands on this page from a state where fantasy-cricket contests are restricted should match the published state-by-state read on the legal page against their own jurisdiction before placing a paid entry. The desk’s terms do not override the state’s published notice.

The desk’s editorial material is updated on the desk’s cadence, not on the partner brand’s. Where the partner brand publishes a material change, the desk announces the change on the news desk within the deck’s review window; the partner brand’s change is authoritative from the partner brand’s effective date.

Three caveats the desk publishes on the terms page. The desk’s terms govern the desk’s editorial material only; the partner brand’s terms govern the partner’s product offering.

The second caveat: the desk’s terms do not override the reader’s own jurisdiction’s published notice. A reader in a state where fantasy-cricket contests are restricted should match the published state-by-state read on the legal page against their own jurisdiction before placing a paid entry.

The third caveat: a material change to the desk’s terms is announced on the news desk with an effective date. A reader’s continued use of the desk’s pages after the effective date is treated as acceptance of the updated terms; the desk recommends re-reading on each material update.

A reader who has found a partner-brand-controlled behaviour the desk has not named is welcome to send the corrections email; the next terms-page refresh reflects the new caveat.

The terms desk closes its read with a note on the editorial material. The desk publishes editorial material only. Articles, guides, references and verification checks. The desk does not publish financial advice, does not publish legal advice and does not publish a partner brand’s product offering.

The four categories of changes the desk announces on the news desk are editorial-review changes, public-notice changes, state-by-state state changes, and reader’s standing changes. Each has a stated cadence.

The change-log cadence the desk works with is six months or sooner if the legal context shifts materially. Material changes are announced on the news desk with an effective date and a clear diff to the prior version.

The jurisdiction-specific note on this page is the desk’s state-by-state read on the legal page. The desk re-publishes the read whenever the relevant state publishes a new notice.

The desk’s coverage area is published on the about page. A reader who wants a different area of coverage is welcome to send a corrections email with a proposed coverage-area addition.